Rivit Invoices
Make an invoice — free, no signupNew invoice

Unpaid invoices

Your client never disputed the invoice. In court, that silence can count

Rivit Invoices · November 13, 2026 · 7 min read

An invoice standing untouched in a desk in-tray with its total marked in blue, a spider web stretched from the tray's corner across the sheet, a wall clock on the left and a small spider hanging on a thread on the right

You send the invoice. Nothing comes back. You send a reminder, then another. The client doesn't complain about the work or question the amount, and doesn't pay.

Four months later you mention small claims court, and the client suddenly has objections. The work was late. The hours look high. They never agreed to that rate.

US courts have an old rule for this situation. It's called an account stated. If you send a client a bill and they keep it without objecting for a reasonable time, a court can treat that silence as agreement that the amount is right. The rule has limits, and it fails more often than freelancers would like. But it's the reason a dated invoice and a record of when it was sent are worth more than they look.

What an account stated is

New York's highest court, in a 1975 decision, used a definition that was already almost a hundred years old. An "account stated is an account balanced and rendered, with an assent to the balance express or implied".

The important word is "implied". A California appeals court explained in 1969 how the agreement usually comes about: "by the creditor rendering a statement of the account to the debtor. If the debtor fails to object to the statement within a reasonable time, the law implies his agreement that the account is correct as rendered."

Texas courts use a three-part test. A Houston appeals court set it out in 2010: there were dealings between the two sides that left one owing the other, "an agreement, express or implied, between the parties fixes an amount due", and the one who owes makes a promise, "express or implied", to pay. The same court said a creditor "need not produce a written contract to establish the agreement between the parties; an implied agreement can arise from the acts and conduct of the parties." That case was about a credit card, not a freelancer, but the test is the general one.

The case to know: five invoices and no reply

The clearest example we found involves a New York law firm and a client who went quiet. It's Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein v. Waters, decided in 2004.

The firm sent the client "five monthly invoices, from October 2002 through February 2003, in a total amount of $40,000." The court's summary of what she did next: "Defendant neither paid nor informed plaintiff of any specific objection to the services rendered."

The firm wrote asking for payment in March 2003 and sued in June. Only then did objections appear. In her formal answer that September she said the fees were not "justly due", and she gave specific objections to the amounts "only months later".

That was too late. The appeals court held that the invoices "were retained without any objection for a sufficient length of time as a matter of law to establish defendant's liability on the account stated cause of action." It ordered judgment for the firm for $40,399.24, plus interest from March 12, 2003.

The court also cleared up a second point. The lower court had thought the firm needed to show both that the client kept the bills and that she paid part of them. Not so: "either retention of bills without objection or partial payment may give rise to an account stated". Either one can be enough in New York.

Silence on its own isn't a promise

This is where it gets less comfortable. The same 1975 New York decision that gave the definition also said that "the mere silence and failure to object to an account stated cannot be construed as an agreement to the correctness of the account". What matters is the whole situation. The facts may be such that "in the absence of an objection made within a reasonable time, an implied account stated may be found".

So there's no magic number of days. None of the decisions we read sets one. The California court called it "a question of fact", which means a judge looks at what happened: the dealings between you, how the bill was sent, how long the client sat on it, and what they said or didn't say.

Three ways it fails

Each of these claims lost, and each one shows a limit.

Put those together and the rule is narrower than it first sounds. An unanswered invoice can settle how much is owed. It can't prove there was a job in the first place.

What this means for your invoices

There can be a second benefit. In the 1969 California case, the debtor complained that the deadline to sue on the original oral agreement was two years, while "the statute of limitations on an account stated is four years." The court's answer: "Where parties by agreement convert a previously existing obligation into an account stated, it frequently results that a longer period of limitation becomes applicable. We see no unfairness in this result." Deadlines differ by state and they change, so check your own before you rely on this.

Texas also has a procedural rule worth knowing about, Rule 185 of its Rules of Civil Procedure. The 1984 text covers a claim "for personal service rendered" on which "a systematic record has been kept". If you swear to the account in an affidavit, it is taken as "prima facie evidence" unless the other side files "a written denial, under oath." We read the 1984 version in a law school archive, not the current official text, so check the current rule or ask the court clerk before you use it.

If you do end up in court, our post on small claims for an unpaid invoice covers limits, fees and what a judgment does and doesn't get you.

Where Rivit Invoices fits

Rivit Invoices doesn't make your client agree to anything. It gives you the records these cases were decided on.

A Rivit Invoices invoice for $3,600 from a freelance developer to a client, showing the date it was sent and the date it was viewed, with a note asking for questions within 14 days, next to a panel added for this post listing what courts looked at in account stated cases
The honest caveats: this is general information from a handful of published court decisions, not legal advice. Account stated is state law, and the details vary. We read cases from New York, California, Florida, Illinois and Texas, decided between 1969 and 2010, and courts in your state may put it differently or have moved on since. None of the decisions sets a number of days for a "reasonable time". The cases here involved invoices and statements sent on paper. We couldn't read a primary source on emailed invoices, so we haven't said how courts treat them. The Texas case concerned a credit card debt and the California case an employee's bonus, so neither is a freelance invoice dispute. A Viewed status shows that the invoice link was opened, not who opened it or that they agreed with it. Reminders only stop on their own when an invoice is paid through the Pay button, so if a client pays by bank transfer, check your bank before the next reminder goes out. Card payments through the Pay button carry Stripe's processing fee, which depends on your country and the card, plus 0.65% from Rivit Invoices. Invoices paid by bank transfer outside Rivit Invoices cost nothing.

The short version

If you bill a client and they keep the invoice without objecting for a reasonable time, a court can treat that as agreement on the amount. That's an account stated. A New York law firm won $40,399.24 this way after five monthly invoices went unanswered. It doesn't work if there was no deal in the first place, if the client objected, or if you can't prove the work. So agree the job in writing, send dated and itemized invoices, follow up in writing, and answer any objection the day it arrives.

Send an invoice you can point to later

Numbered, dated and itemized, with one clear total. Free, no signup. Add a free account to see when it was sent and when it was opened.

Make an invoice, free
Sources: Interman Industrial Products, Ltd. v. R. S. M. Electron Power, Inc., 37 N.Y.2d 151 (N.Y. Court of Appeals, June 11, 1975) (definition; silence and "reasonable time"), Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, LLP v. Waters, 13 A.D.3d 51 (N.Y. App. Div., 1st Dept., December 2, 2004) (five monthly invoices totalling $40,000; judgment for $40,399.24; retention or partial payment), Martin H. Bauman Associates, Inc. v. H & M International Transport, Inc., 171 A.D.2d 479 (N.Y. App. Div., 1st Dept., March 14, 1991) ($44,438.88 claimed; no liability from an account stated alone), Zinn v. Fred R. Bright Co., 271 Cal. App. 2d 597 (Cal. Court of Appeal, April 9, 1969) (implied agreement; question of fact; two-year and four-year limitation periods as they stood then), Merrill-Stevens Dry Dock Co. v. "Corniche Express", 400 So. 2d 1286 (Fla. 3d District Court of Appeal, June 30, 1981) (invoices marked in disagreement), Dreyer Medical Clinic, S.C. v. Corral, 227 Ill. App. 3d 221 (Ill. App. Ct., April 17, 1992) ($9,949.98 billed; underlying liability not proved), Busch v. Hudson & Keyse, LLC, 312 S.W.3d 294 (Tex. App., Houston 14th Dist., May 11, 2010) (Texas three-part test; no written contract needed), Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 185, as amended effective April 1, 1984 (South Texas College of Law rules archive). Opinion texts are from the Harvard Law School Library's Caselaw Access Project (static.case.law). All checked November 13, 2026.